Latest News

November 2011

Family Justice Review Report

PARITY Response Nov 2011

November 2011

Labour Force Data

UK July - Sept 2011

August 2011

National A-level result - 2011

England and Wales

April 2011

Legal challenge to biased Gender Studies course

Legal and/or financial support urgently sought

March 2011

Perverting the Course of Justice

CPS Consultation on False Allegations

PARITY response

December 2010

DV 'Go' orders'

Critique by Louise Laing,

Solicitor

August 2010

State Pension Age rise to 66

PARITY response to DWP 'Call for Evidence'

July 2010

Domestic Violence

The Male Perspective

September 2008

Partner Abuse

Partner Abuse in England and Wales 1995 - 2007

July 2008

Inquiry into Domestic Violence

Home Affairs Select Committee Inquiry into Domestic Violence

7th November 2007

Domestic Violence

Home Affairs Select Committee Enquiry into Domestic Violence

1st August 2007

Boys Education

PARITY promotes London conference

Action Group

DV ‘Go’ orders (where suspicion rules)

 

At present this scheme is not intended to apply to Scotland. In this jurisdiction, the Matrimonial Homes (Family Protection) (Scotland) Act 1981 introduced protective measures in the form of exclusion orders whereby a spouse (or cohabitant) can be excluded from the family home and also interdicted from approaching the applicant spouse. The court will grant such an order, "where it appears to the court that the making of the order is necessary for the protection of the applicant or any child of the family from any conduct or threatened or reasonably apprehended conduct of the non-applicant spouse which is or would be injurious to the physical or mental health of the applicant or child". Such orders can be obtained on an interim (emergency) basis, provided the alleged abuser has been afforded an opportunity of being heard by the court. The Scottish Parliament recognised that there was a need for further protective measures. The Protection from Abuse (Scotland) Act 2001 allows a power of arrest to be attached to an interdict. The police may arrest the interdicted person without warrant if they have reasonable cause for suspecting that person of being in breach of the interdict and consider that there would, if that person were not arrested, be a risk of abuse or further abuse by that person in breach of the interdict. In such cases, the complainer has already obtained an interdict from the court. They have satisfied the court that the power of arrest is necessary. Further, the court will only grant a power of arrest if satisfied that the interdicted person has been given the opportunity to be heard by, or represented before, the court. The Scottish position maintains appropriate checks and balances as between the complainer and the complained against party. The police can also revert to the basic breach of the peace law and encourage a troublesome individual to remove from the home for a short period, or impose bail conditions requiring them to do so.

 

Depriving an individual of the right to occupy their own home is a significant step and the law in Scotland respects that by providing a procedural and evidential framework. Achieving that outcome based on suspicion alone sets a potentially dangerous precedent which impacts on the rights of all individuals.  In the meantime, we await with interest assessments of the scheme from south of the border.

 

Louise Laing is a Solicitor with the Family Law Team of Morton Fraser, Solictors,
London and Edinburgh

 

http://www.morton-fraser.com/publications/articles/1267

 

Posted: Wednesday 8 December 2010

 

Page 1

Focus
Sex Discrimination
Boys' Education
Men's Health
Equal Parenting
Male Victims of Domestic Abuse